公告 欢迎新老车友回家!本站为历史数据展示站点,如需发布内容请关注后续小程序。
汽车技术 / (转贴)欧洲NCAP评价“千里马”和即将上市的...
凡
#1
(转贴) 欧洲NCAP评价“千里马”和即将上市的“嘉华”为最不安全车!!! 欧洲NCAP评价“千里马”和即将上市的“嘉华”为最不安全车!!! 首先声明欧洲NCAP测试对象为1998款ACCENT(千里马)和2003款Carnival(嘉华)。本人认为有必要声明一下国内款型和其关系。 国产千里马是在1999款ACCENT基础上引进的,有人会说你比较98款ACCENT的碰撞测试没有意义,其实这是你不了解现代车型ACCENT的发展,总体而言,96-99 ACCENT在车身设计上没有任何的差别(从外观就可以明显地看出来),区别仅在于装备不同,就像04款千里马和03款千里马的关系一样,仅仅增加一些装备而已,因此无关碰撞测试的结果。因此从98款ACCENT的测试结果,就可以了解国产ACCENT(千里马)的碰撞结果了。 再说说嘉华,国内引进的"嘉华“应该就是2003款,因此碰撞结果应很说明问题。 好,言归正传,我们来看欧洲NCAP的测试: 在权威的欧洲安全碰撞测试机构NCAP测试结果中,98款ACCENT(千里马)仅得到两星评价。而且最后一颗星还被认定根本就达不到法规的要求!由于这个原因,该款车不能参加下一年的新车测试! 总体评价:“ACCENT获得两星评价并且最后一颗星被标记是为了标明在侧面碰撞中的高致命性胸部伤害不合格(unacceptably high risk of chest injury),由于这个原因,该款车不能达到明年10月开始实施的新车立法要求。ACCENT在pedestrian tests中除保险杠外表现都不好,然而,在所有三个测试方面在表面上(on its surface)达到了合法的要求。(这句话翻译的不知道恰不恰当,后面有原文,请自行参照理解)” 在权威的欧洲安全碰撞测试机构NCAP测试结果中,2003款Carnival(嘉华)也仅得到两星评价。总体评价是“嘉华在这些测试中表现的很差(did badly),驾驶员的头部,胸部和腿都受到严重伤害(badly damaged),副驾胸部同样受到严重伤害。嘉华的车身在正面碰撞试验中被严重损坏变得非常脆弱,正面测试是各种测试中最差的,因为驾驶员的头部和胸部都撞到了车轮!足部受损,踏板被撞成反方向,儿童的保护作的还不错,达到欧洲性能标准,但是总体而言对乘员的保护是很差的(was poor)。” 综上所述,在我以前写的一篇文章《评价一辆车不能光看发动机性能!冷眼看“雷霆动力”》(但后来莫名其妙被删,大家可参看http://www.xcar.com.cn/viewthread.php?tid=606422&fpage=1),就曾表达过这样的看法,千里马动力性数据指标确实不错,但中国的消费者却无从知晓其车身设计制造的低劣,本片文章仅以安全性角度对其进行分析和评判。以供大家明晰! 附原文: 千里马测试原文: Hyundai Accent 1.3 GLS Front and side impact rating Pedestrian rating Test Scores: Front 4 (25%) Side 9 (50%) Overall 13 (38%) Pedestrian 14 (39%) The Accent earned two stars but the last star is flagged to indicate the unacceptably high risk of chest injury in the side impact. For this reason, the car would not meet the requirements of legislation commencing next October for new model types. The Accent's bumper performed exceptionally well in the pedestrian tests, however. All three test sites on its surface met the proposed legislative requirements. Impact Protection Frontal Impact The passenger compartment became unstable in the impact. The driver's door lower hinge became detached, while the upper hinge was nearly detached. The door itself had lost much of its strength – its front pillar was displaced inwards and seams in the footwell split open. The driver's head contact was stable on the airbag but his chest was hit by the airbag as it inflated. Overall, protection for the driver's lower limbs was weak or worse. Side Impact The driver's head struck the seat belt upper mount adjuster rack on the central door pillar and as a consequence protection was only adequate. All three of the dummy's ribs were overloaded because they were struck by the pillar and the rear of the door. The pillar and the door armrest also impacted his abdomen, resulting in a 'weak' protection rating for that body region. Protection for his pelvis was good, however. Child Protection Hyundai does not make any recommendation about which child restraints to use, so two were purchased locally and were found to be incompatible with the car's rear belts. The slot in the belt tongue lay above the contact point on the restraint. In the frontal impact, the three-year-old child's head was allowed to move forward by an excessive amount, although that of the 18-month-old was satisfactorily controlled. In the side impact, the three-year-old's restraint twisted and the child's head was not contained within the wings of the restraint. Pedestrian Protection The bumper performed exceptionally well, meeting proposed legislative requirements. However, all three test sites on the bonnet leading edge gave poor performance, as did all the adult head test sites. The child head fared better. Two thirds of the test sites met the proposed legislative requirements but the remainder performed poorly. Model History & Safety Equipment The Accent is fitted with power assisted steering as standard. The car tested was fitted with a driver's airbag, which will be standard equipment across the EU on cars ordered from June. Note: other variants will not be fitted with all of the above equipment, which would affect their safety rating. Body type 5-door hatchback Model year 1998 Kerb weight 983 VIN and date when rating applies KMHVA31LPWU372237 嘉华测试原文: KIA Carnival/Sedona Front and side impact rating Pedestrian rating Test Scores: Front 4 (25%) Side 14 (78%) Overall 18 Pedestrian 4 (11%) KIA’s large MPV did badly in these tests. Its driver risked damage to his head, chest and legs while the front passenger risked chest injuries, too. The Carnival’s body was badly damaged in the frontal impact and became unstable. It did worse in the frontal test than in the others because the driver’s head and chest hit the steering wheel, the footwell ruptured and the pedals were pushed backwards by the impact. The child restraints did a good job, meeting Euro NCAP performance requirements. But protection for pedestrians was poor. Impact Protection Frontal Impact The passenger safety cell was overwhelmed by the impact. Structural damage to the fascia and lower body was so great that little if any protection was given to the driver’s chest, legs and feet. And the distance that the steering wheel was displaced meant that the driver’s airbag could not do its work properly. Hard points behind the fascia added to the injury risks for those in the front. Only a two-point centre rear belt was fitted, and this provides less protection than that given by a three-point belt. Side Impact For a car without side airbags, the Kia did reasonably, although the driver’s head hit the door pillar and his arm struck the side window, though not hard enough to break the glass. His body was also hit by the seat and door as the impact pushed it inwards. Child Protection The restraints (forward-facing for the older child, rear-facing for the younger) worked well, meeting all Euro NCAP performance requirements. A permanent warning against putting a rear-facing restraint on a seat opposite an airbag was given on the back of the passenger’s sun visor. However, it was written in English and as such was inappropriate for the vehicle tested, which was intended for sale in Holland. Pedestrian Protection The parts of the vehicle’s front where a child’s head might hit offered some cushioning but other areas were unforgiving. Euro NCAP believes that KIA should take pedestrian protection more seriously if it is to offer realistic protection to this vulnerable group of road users. Model History & Safety Equipment The Carnival/Sedona features twin frontal airbags, front belt pre-tensioners and load limiters and a two-point centre rear belt. ISOFIX anchorages are fitted to the mid-row outer seats. Side airbags are an optional extra. Make, model and hand of drive KIA Carnival/Sedona 2.9 D LHD Body type MPV Model year 2003 Kerb weight 2220 VIN and date when rating applies KNEUP751336471405 Cars built on the same platform None
米
#2
碰撞不合格这个可是大问题哦。。。
青
#3
9494!
简
#4
不会吧!!那得叫老爸开车小心点!! 不要开太快!!
← 返回 453 阅读 · 3 回复
本站为只读浏览站点,原帖内容原样保留,不支持回复与编辑。